
1500 Questions | GitHub Advanced Security 2026
About this course
Detailed Exam Domain Coverage:Secure Development Lifecycle (18%), Topics: Code Review, Secure Coding Practices, Supply Chain SecurityVulnerability Detection (21%), Topics: Vulnerability Scanning, Exploit Prediction, Vulnerability RemediationSecurity Incident Response (25%), Topics: Threat Detection, Incident Response, Security OrchestrationSecurity and Compliance (16%), Topics: Compliance, Security Policies, GovernanceDeveloping Secure Code Solutions (20%), Topics: Secure Coding Practices, Secure APIs, Secure StorageI have carefully structured this comprehensive test bank to validate your skills in securing your software supply chain, detecting and responding to security vulnerabilities, and improving the overall security posture of your code, This curriculum contains 1500 original practice questions that I created to deeply reflect the exact domains of the official GitHub Advanced Security exam, By practicing with these scenarios, you will build genuine hands-on familiarity with vulnerability scanning, exploit prediction, and threat detection, I made sure each question provides a highly detailed explanation so you actually master the core concepts behind secure APIs and governance rather than just memorizing options,Sample Practice QuestionsQuestion 1: Secure Development Lifecycle Which of the following approaches best enforces a secure software supply chain within a GitHub repository? Options:A) Granting admin privileges to all contributors to speed up the code review processB) Disabling branch protections to allow rapid merging of security patchesC) Enabling dependency review enforcement to prevent introducing vulnerable dependenciesD) Storing hardcoded secrets in a private repository instead of a public oneE) Bypassing status checks for automated bot pull requestsF) Relying solely on manual code reviews for dependency updatesCorrect Answer: CExplanations:Option A: Incorrect, granting admin privileges violates the principle of least privilege,Option B: Incorrect, branch protections are essential for enforcing code reviews and status checks,Option C: Correct, dependency review enforcement automatically checks for vulnerabilities in pull requests before they are merged, securing the supply chain,Option D: Incorrect, storing secrets in code, even in private repositories, is a major security risk,Option E: Incorrect, bypassing checks for bots can introduce unverified malicious code into the environment,Option F: Incorrect, manual reviews alone are prone to human error and do not scale effectively for large dependency trees,Overall Explanation: Securing the supply chain requires automated tooling to detect vulnerable dependencies before they enter the main branch, Dependency review enforcement is a key GitHub Advanced Security feature that achieves this exact goal,Question 2: Vulnerability Detection When configuring GitHub CodeQL for vulnerability scanning, which action ensures that both standard vulnerabilities and highly severe exploit predictions are caught during a pull request? Options:A) Running CodeQL only on the default branch once a weekB) Configuring the CodeQL action to trigger on 'pull_request' and using the 'security-extended' query suiteC) Disabling the autobuild feature for compiled languagesD) Setting the vulnerability alert threshold to only notify for 'low' severity issuesE) Removing the dependency graph configuration from the repositoryF) Uploading a third-party SARIF file without configuring CodeQL rulesCorrect Answer: BExplanations:Option A: Incorrect, weekly scans do not prevent vulnerabilities from being introduced in active pull requests,Option B: Correct, triggering on pull requests catches issues early, and the security-extended suite includes advanced exploit prediction queries,Option C: Incorrect, autobuild or a manual build step is required for CodeQL to analyze compiled languages,Option D: Incorrect, filtering only for low severity ignores critical and high vulnerabilities,Option E: Incorrect, the dependency graph is required for Dependabot, not directly CodeQL, but removing it weakens overall detection,Option F: Incorrect, uploading SARIF files imports alerts but does not configure native CodeQL scanning mechanisms,Overall Explanation: Effective vulnerability detection requires integrating static analysis directly into the developer workflow, CodeQL configured on pull requests with extended queries ensures maximum coverage before code is merged,Question 3: Security Incident Response During a security incident involving a leaked personal access token, what is the most appropriate first step utilizing GitHub's security orchestration tools?
Skills you'll gain
Available Coupons
Course Information
Level: All Levels
Suitable for learners at this level
Duration: Self-paced
Total course content
Instructor: Udemy Instructor
Expert course creator
This course includes:
- 📹Video lectures
- đź“„Downloadable resources
- 📱Mobile & desktop access
- 🎓Certificate of completion
- ♾️Lifetime access
You May Also Like
Explore more courses similar to this one


